METHOD & SCIENTIFIC GOVERNANCE

Rigour means knowing what cannot be claimed.

Footprint Tool separates operational screening, life-cycle Environmental Footprint methods and WEFE Nexus research. The software never fills scientific gaps with invented values.

Corporate OEF — the default organisation pathway

An Organisation Environmental Footprint study addresses a defined organisation, product portfolio, reporting unit and reference period across relevant life-cycle stages. Applicable OEF sector rules, allocation and comparability requirements must be evaluated.

An inventory containing only water, electricity and fuel supports limited physical screening—not a complete OEF. Footprint Tool therefore labels early corporate work as an OEF-aligned draft.

Product PEF — optional and function-specific

A Product Environmental Footprint study begins with a defined function, performance, lifetime and functional unit, plus applicable PEF category rules. Product PEF results cannot simply be summed to derive an organisation-wide OEF where processes or inventories overlap.

Operational screening — working calculations

The current calculation layer implements physical water balances, delivered energy, operational GHG and selected engineering formulas. Each result includes its boundary, units, source and factor version.

OutputBasisExplicit limitation
Water consumed (m³)Withdrawal − returns ± storage/transfersNot EF water-use impact
Delivered energy (kWh equiv.)Electricity + onsite use + fuel LHV + imported heatNot a 17th EF category
Operational GHG (kg CO₂e)Listed activity × pinned emission factorsNot full EF climate change

The sixteen EF categories

Full EF normalisation and weighting require sixteen complete, unit-compatible characterised results from a reviewed life-cycle model. The table below is an educational transcription of EF 3.1 reference factors from the supplied guide, not a production factor licence.

CategoryCharacterised unitIllustrative NFWeight
Climate changekg CO₂ eq755021.06%
Ozone depletionkg CFC-11 eq0.05236.31%
Human toxicity, cancerCTUh0.00001732.13%
Human toxicity, non-cancerCTUh0.0001291.84%
Particulate matterDisease incidence0.0005958.96%
Ionising radiationkBq U-235 eq42205.01%
Photochemical ozone formationkg NMVOC eq40.94.78%
Acidificationmol H⁺ eq55.66.20%
Eutrophication, terrestrialmol N eq1773.71%
Eutrophication, freshwaterkg P eq1.612.80%
Eutrophication, marinekg N eq19.52.96%
Ecotoxicity, freshwaterCTUe567001.92%
Land usePt8190007.94%
Water usem³ world eq deprived115008.51%
Resource use, fossilsMJ650008.32%
Resource use, minerals and metalskg Sb eq0.06367.55%

Single-score release gate

A single EF score is blocked if even one category, compatible factor version, dataset right, scope record, uncertainty review or required approval is missing. Missing categories never become zero.

The separate training fixture reproduces 0.702655 Pt from fictional characterised inputs. It exists to test arithmetic and is never displayed as a company score.

WEFE Nexus — separate research and decision support

Water, Energy, Food and Ecosystems indicators may support scenario comparison using versioned, context-specific benchmarks and directions. This is not an EU EF category or certification.

Composite indices remain unavailable until the method, weights, evidence and applicability policy have scientific approval. Missing or non-applicable domains are never treated as favourable scores.

Method references

European Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/2279, Annexes I and III; JRC EF 3.1 reference package and transition resources; supplied WEFE methodological guide v2.0 and Overall Environmental Footprint calculation guide. Production studies must check for newer applicable releases and pin their selected versions.

See the method in a working workspace.

Explore real calculation flows using isolated synthetic data.

Explore the demo